| |
What Is Contemplation? by Ajahn Chah
The following teaching is taken from a session of questions
and answers that took place at Wat Gor Nork monastery during the Vassa of 1979,
between Venerable Ajahn Chah and a group of English-speaking disciples.
Some rearrangement of the sequence of conversation has been made for ease of
understanding.
______________________________________________
The knowing that arises is above and beyond the process of
thinking. It leads to not being fooled by thinking any more.
______________________________________________
Question:
When you teach about the value of
contemplation, are you speaking of sitting and thinking over particular themes -
the thirty-two parts of the body, for instance?
Answer: That
is not necessary when the mind is truly
still. When tranquility is properly established the right object of
investigation becomes obvious. When contemplation is 'True', there is no
discrimination into 'right' and 'wrong'. 'good' and 'bad'; there is nothing even
like that. You don't sit there thinking, 'Oh, this is like that and that
is like this' etc. That is a coarse form of contemplation.
Meditative contemplation is not merely a matter of thinking -- rather
it's what we call 'contemplation in silence'. Whilst going about our
daily routine we mindfully consider the real nature of existence through
comparisons. This is a coarse kind of investigation but it leads to the
real thing.
When you talk about contemplating the body and mind, though, do we actually
use thinking? Can thinking produce true insight? Is this vipassana?
In the beginning we need to work using thinking, even
though later on we go beyond it. When we are doing true contemplation all
dualistic thinking has ceased; although we need to consider dualistically to get
started. Eventually all thinking and pondering comes to an end.
You say that there must be sufficient tranquility (samadhi) to contemplate.
Just how tranquil do you mean?
Tranquil enough for there to be presence of mind.
Do you mean staying with the here-and-now, not thinking about the past and
future?
Thinking about the past and future is all right if you understand what
these things really are, but you must not get caught up in them. Treat
them the same as you would anything else -- don't get caught up. When you
see thinking as just thinking, then that's wisdom. Don't believe in any of
it! Recognize that all of it is just something that has arisen and will
cease. Simply see everything just as it is -- it is what it is -- the mind
is the mind -- it's not anything or anybody in itself. Happiness is just
happiness, suffering is just suffering -- it is just what it is. When you
see this you will be beyond doubt.
I still don't understand. Is true contemplating the same as thinking?
We use thinking as a
tool, but the knowing that arises because of its use is above and beyond the
process of thinking; it leads to our not being fooled by our thinking any more.
You recognize that all thinking is merely the movement of the mind, and also
that knowing is not born and doesn't die. What do you think all this
movement called 'mind' comes out of? What we talk about as the mind -- all
the activity -- is just the conventional mind. It's not the real mind at
all. What is real just IS, it's not arising and it's not passing away. Trying to understand these things just by talking
about them, though, won't work. We need to really consider impermanence,
unsatisfactoriness and impersonality (anicca, dukkha, anatta); that is,
we need to use thinking to contemplate the nature of conventional reality.
What comes out of this work is wisdom -- and emptiness. Even though there
may still be thinking, it's empty -- you are not affected by it.
How can we arrive at this stage of the real mind?
Your work with the
mind you already have, of course! See that all that arises is uncertain,
that there is nothing stable or substantial. See it clearly and see that
there is really nowhere to take a hold of anything -- it's all empty. When
you see the things that arise in the mind for what they are, you won't have to
work with thinking any more. You will have no doubt whatsoever in these
matters. To talk about the 'real mind' and so on, may have a relative use in
helping us understand. We invent names for the sake of study, but actually
nature just is how it is. For example, sitting here downstairs on the
stone floor. The floor is the base -- it's not moving or going
anywhere. Upstairs, above us is what has arisen out of this.
Upstairs is like everything that we see in our minds: form, feeling, memory,
thinking. Really, they don't exist in the way we presume they do.
They are merely the conventional mind. As soon as they arise, they pass
away again; they don't really exist in themselves.
There is a story in the
scriptures about Venerable Sariputta examining a bhikkhu before allowing him to
go off wandering (dhutanga vatta). He asked him how he would
reply if he was questioned, 'What happens to the Buddha after he dies?'
The bhikkhu replied, 'When form, feeling, perception, thinking and consciousness
arise, they pass away.' Venerable Sariputta passed him on that.
Practice is not just a
matter of talking about arising and passing away, though. You must see it
for yourself. When you are sitting, simply see what is actually happening.
Don't follow anything. Contemplation doesn't mean being caught up in
thinking. The contemplative thinking of one on the Way is not the same as
the thinking of the world. Unless you understand properly what is meant by
contemplation, the more you think the more confused you will become.
The reason we make such a
point of the cultivation of mindfulness is because we need to see clearly what
is going on. We must understand the processes of our hearts. When such
mindfulness and understanding are present, then everything is taken care of.
Why do you think one who knows the Way never acts out of anger or delusion?
The causes for these things to arise are simply not there. Where would
they come from? Mindfulness has got everything covered.
Is this mind you are talking about called the 'Original Mind'?
What do you mean?
It seems as if you are saying there is something else outside of the
conventional body-mind (the five khandhas). Is there something
else? What do you call it?
There isn't anything
and we don't call it anything -- that's all there is to it! Be finished
with all of it. Even the knowing doesn't belong to anybody, so be finished
with that, too! Consciousness is not an individual, not a being, not a
self, not an other, so finish with that -- finish with everything! There
is nothing worth wanting! It's all just a load of trouble. When you
see clearly like this then everything is finished.
Could we not call it the 'Original Mind'?
You can call it that
if you insist. You can call it whatever you like, for the sake of
conventional reality. But you must understand this point properly.
This is very important. If we didn't make use of conventional reality we
wouldn't have any words or concepts with which to consider actual reality --
Dhamma. This is very important to understand.
What degree of tranquility are you talking about at this stage?
And what quality of mindfulness is needed?
You don't need to go
thinking like that. If you didn't have the right amount of tranquility you
wouldn't be able to deal with these questions at all. You need
enough stability and concentration to know what is going on -- enough for
clarity and understanding to arise.
Asking questions like this
shows that you are still doubting. You need enough tranquility of mind to
no longer get caught in doubting what you are doing. If you had done
the practice you would understand these things. The more you carry on with
this sort of questioning, the more confusing you make it. It's all right
to talk if the talking helps contemplation, but it won't show you the way things
actually are. This Dhamma is not understood because somebody else tells
you about it, you must see it for yourself -- paccattam. If
you have the quality of understanding that we have been talking about,
then we say that your duty to do anything is over; which means that you don't do
anything. If there is still something to do, then it's your duty to
do it.
Simply keep putting everything down, and know that that is what you
are doing. You don't need to be always checking up on yourself, worrying
about things like 'How much samadhi' -- it will always be the right
amount. Whatever arises in your practice, let it go; know it all as
uncertain, impermanent. Remember that! It's all uncertain.
Be finished with all of it. This is the Way that will take you to the
source -- to your Original Mind.
back |